In her recently published Annual Report for 2008/09, Janet Gaymer, the Commissioner for Public Appointments, outlined her commitment to the development of OCPA’s ongoing diversity and talent strategy.

The report detailed the Commissioners intention to continue to identify the particular issues affecting under-represented groups, and to develop practical tools to assist potential applicants from these groups. In 2008 the Commissioner was given new powers to promote diversity in public appointments, and seems determined to do all she can to make sure those appointed to public bodies are ‘drawn from the broadest possible sources of talent in society’, in the last year of her tenure.

The report also details some statistics relating to public appointments, and particularly the diversity of appointees, and the need for the development of the talent pipeline from those groups currently under-represented in public appointments becomes clear.

Whilst the report shows a slight increase in the number of women appointed or reappointed to public boards in 2008/09 on the previous year, the levels were still significantly less than the numbers recorded between 2001 and 2003. There was also a slight percentage increase in the numbers of ethnic minority candidates appointed or reappointed, up to 7.9% from 7.7% the previous year. The numbers of candidates declaring a disability fell from 4.6% in 2007/08 to 3.95 in 2008/09.The average age of appointees and reappointees continues to be between 46 and 65, with only 2% being below 35.

In the reporting year, there were 2,417 appointments and reappointments to bodies within OCPA’s remit. 1359 of these were new appointments, and 1058 reappointments. Having over 43% of reappointments certainly makes it difficult to redress any issues of diversity, and does seem to suggest that boards tend not be looking for new board members with fresh ideas, opinions and perspectives. Maybe current tenure lengths aren’t long enough to have a real impact, and board members feel they still have more to give. However, if we are to try and increase the diversity of boards, and alter their makeup significantly, the emphasis will need to shift to new appointments, and the Commissioner’s intention to increase the talent pool of diversity of the pool of applicants to these posts will be crucial.

The report sets out some of the Commissioner’s plans, including a pilot cross-sectoral mentoring scheme, a commitment to maintain the principle of selection on merit and focus groups and meetings with organisations interested in different aspects of diversity. What other suggestions do you have? How would you help to increase the talent pipeline?